Glasner: Probably an exit clause in players is even good

A transfer period is not always a wish concert. That had to learn that Filip Kostic learned. In order to force his change to Lazio Rome, he refused the final training and the journey to Bielefeld.

But that from the Romans via two-feet to the Eintracht emailed offer more than ten million euros only accepted sports board Markus Kröse understandably not. After the most recent experience with Kostic, Glasner can thus give rise to the at least in public controversial exit clauses in players quite something positive. If the price is set, no player can say: Hey, I want you to go cheaper. An exit clause ensures complete transparency. An example: If a player gives an exit clause over 25 million euros, he would never be anyway When we did not sell him for 10 million, explains the coach and continues: If one goes away with the other club at 20 million, it is even more harmonious because you have volunteered by five million. Now is the situation So that there is no exit clause and the player is eaten because we do not let him go for eight or ten million.

Extension clause at Glasner? Important is internal transparency

But what about the workpapers of the trainers? In principle, transparency and clarity are the most important, emphasizes Glasner. Nevertheless, he reveals whether he has anchored an exit clause in the contract as his predecessor Adi Hütter: I smear only one point from my employment contract: I can not talk about the content, how many other workers also. Important is the internal transparency

_ Read in the detailed interview in the Lazio Rome Monday edition (here as eMagazine available) with Oliver Glasner as well as how he deals with the difficult season start, which advantages he sees in the conversion to four chain, why it always takes a little longer until Teams taken over by him to implement his ideas, and what drives him as a coach. _

Reyna even overtakes Hvertz: the youngest with 50 Bundesliga inserts